Skip to content
Medium

Proving Summation Formulas by Induction

Simple Explanation

Many formulas that add up a pattern of numbers (like 1+2+...+n) can be proved correct for every n using induction β€” the inductive step typically involves adding the NEW term (the (k+1)th term) to both sides of the assumed formula at n=k.

Why Do We Need It?

Summation formulas let you add up huge numbers of terms instantly instead of one at a time, and induction is how these formulas are actually verified as correct, not just guessed.

Formula

Sum of the First n Positive Integers

1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1) / 2

The sum of every positive integer from 1 up to n, provable by mathematical induction.

n
β€” the largest integer included in the sum, a positive integer

When to use it: Whenever the sum of consecutive integers from 1 to n is needed directly, without adding them one by one.

Worked Example

Prove the formula for the sum of the first n positive integers

Prove that 1+2+3+...+n = n(n+1)/2 for all positive integers n β‰₯ 1.

    Why Does This Work?

    The inductive hypothesis gives the sum of the first k terms; adding exactly the next term, (k+1), to both sides of that equation is what correctly extends the claim to n=k+1 β€” the right side then just needs ordinary algebra (factoring) to be reshaped into the form the formula predicts for n=k+1.

    Real-Life Example

    Computing the total number of unique connections in a growing network

    A network engineer needs a formula for the total number of unique cable connections needed to directly connect every pair among n junction boxes.

    A summation formula (related to 1+2+...+(n-1)) gives this instantly for any n β€” and induction is exactly how such a formula gets rigorously verified as correct for every possible n.

    Practice

    Using 1+2+...+n = n(n+1)/2, find the sum of the first 10 positive integers.

    Medium

    Common mistake

    In the inductive step, forgetting to explicitly add the NEW term (k+1) to both sides β€” simply substituting n=k+1 into the formula without connecting it back to the inductive hypothesis is not a valid proof.

    Quick Review

    • Add the (k+1)th term to both sides of the inductive hypothesis.
    • Then use algebra (usually factoring) to match the formula's predicted form at n=k+1.
    • 1+2+...+n = n(n+1)/2 is a classic example, provable this way.